![]() M1A1 Firepower Enhancements Program: Maintaining the Combat Edge of the M1A1 by Capt. ( side that shoots first wins warriors rage&f=false) Warriors Rage: The Great Tank Battle of 73 Easting by Douglas Macgregor, pg. " Thus on 77% of occasions success attended the side which fired first" In the cases where the sides were evenly matched the first shot appears to have had a significant bearing upon the outcome." " The values in Table 5 give further emphasis to the fact that the side having numerical superiority which fired first was invariably successful. The success attending the side who fired first (pg. ![]() "The study concluded that the single most important factor in tank-versus-tank fighting was which side spotted the enemy first, engaged first, and hit first."Ī Survey of Tank Warfare in Europe from D-Day to 12th August 1944 prepared by H.G. Army Ballistics Research Lab study titled "Data on World War II Tank Engagements: Involving the U.S. ( vs Sherman%3A Battle of the Bulge 1944 BRL&f=false) 230 + Panther vs Sherman by Steven Zaloga, pg. Almost all deal with WWII.Īrmored Thunderbolt by Steven Zaloga, pg. Here are some sources (with quotes) that repeat the "the side that shoots first, wins" rule. I am especially interested in the Arab-Israeli Wars. I'm trying to find sources that have concluded this based on analysis of modern (post-WWII) tank battles, as most sources I've read that state this are focused on WWII. If you know of any material like that, please give a citation or link to it in a reply. The tank(s) that identifies, fires and hits the opposing tank first often emerges as the victor. Over the years, I've come across many sources stating that the dominant factor in determining the victor of a tank vs tank battle is who fires first.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |